[WarInEur] In re Finland panzer push

[srm]

Wow, what a shocker. yet another pro-axis, anti-soviet
allies "improvement".

ho hum.
--- Hansen <ultrasoundimages at sbcglobal.net> wrote:

> 
> Kent brings up a good point in regards to Finland. 
> 
> I would suggest an alternative to how to handle the
> Finish front.
> 
> 1) I would make the penalty for not maintaining the
> rail line (not just a
> LOC) from Murmansk to Siberia (the great motherland
> of Russian supply) to be
> a production penalty (say 5% or 10% reduction in
> Arms point production).
> This would generally be worth more to both sides (in
> keeping or removing)
> than political points and it better reflects the
> importance of Murmansk,
> which was not political but for Western supply.
> 
> 2) I would change the Finnish restriction to not
> being able to enter a
> Soviet ZOC outside of Finland (or maybe X hexes
> outside of Finland) until
> Leningrad has fallen. So the Finns can move if the
> Russians don't shield
> them, but not much of a shield is needed. The
> beginning screen of 1-4 are
> sufficient to protect the Murmansk railroad and thus
> the western supply.
> After Leningrad falls, the normal restrictions can
> apply.
> 
> Game wise this hurts the soviets as they lose the
> gamey use of the Finnish
> front troops, don't have the magical force field
> that pens the Finns up
> north and currently have no reason to protect
> Murmansk or the railhead. I
> honestly don't know enough about the real world
> Finnish front to know if the
> Soviets stripped it or not. 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> WarInEur mailing list
> WarInEur at mailman.halisp.net
> http://mailman.halisp.net/mailman/listinfo/warineur
> 



       
____________________________________________________________________________________
Moody friends. Drama queens. Your life? Nope! - their life, your story. Play Sims Stories at Yahoo! Games.
http://sims.yahoo.com/