[WarInEur] UK Garrisions

[SGMINFO at aol.com]

Testing the new variant with three options in particular has pointed up to  
me an interesting side effect.
 
Options
1.Changing unit strengths
2.Attrition
3.Sealion
 
 
UK required garrisons are not demanded, but with CW units at lower final  
full strengths...the UK is very much more vulnerable to any possible Axis  
invasion.
 
Sealion makes such adventures possible for OKW
The allies really do have to take counsel of their fears and protect the  UK
The option of running an early RAF stratgic bombing campaign can annoy the  
Germans enough to send a force, the damage being done to German industry making 
 such an investment in time and resources seem relatively attractive.
 
All of which pressure feeds into other effects...
 
Investment in SB assets leaves the UK somewhat 'underpowered' which  corrects 
the tendency for a massive buildup in the midle east and  a spoiling 
offensive against the Italians.
 
The weaker allied position makes the North AFrican campaign much more  
attractive for the Axis
 
 
There is a great deal more action in the early war period as the Axis find  
the British cannot lock them into a defensive stalemate in France and in North  
Africa.
 
 
-|steve|-



   
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.halisp.net/pipermail/warineur/attachments/20071202/ff5a63dc/attachment.html