[WarInEur] RE: 0.9.56 bug - Vichy units did not place

[Bruce Denney]

Also noticed that while Mainland Vichy did become "Vichy/Neutral",  North
Africa and Levant remained "Allied" instead of becoming neutral.

 

Bruce

 

  _____  

From: sgminfo [mailto:sgminfo at aol.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2007 12:11 PM
To: Bruce Denney
Cc: warineur at mailman.halisp.net
Subject: Re: [WarInEur] RE: 0.9.56 bug - Vichy units did not place

 

Bruce Denney wrote: 

I have been through two production cycles 0 still no Vichy units.

 

Vichy was declared rather late. I had missed something - don't know if it
was intentional. Paris was occupied vichy rolled for and missed. But I ended
up moving the german unit out of Paris. Did not notice that Vichy was no
longer being rolled for. Is it intentional that even though Vichy is German
controlled if there is not an Axis unit in Paris that Vichy will not roll?

 

Even at that the computer seemed to roll three 1's on a roll before Vichy
was declared. Has there been a statistical study done on the random number
generator? I have no actual statistics but it seems that there are a lot of
either 1;s of 6's - no proof - just a gut feeling.

 

Bruce

 

  _____  

From: sgm [mailto:sgminfo at aol.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2007 9:24 AM
To: Bruce Denney
Cc: warineur at mailman.halisp.net
Subject: Re: 0.9.56 bug - Vichy units did not place

 

 

 





  _____  



 
_______________________________________________
WarInEur mailing list
WarInEur at mailman.halisp.net
http://mailman.halisp.net/mailman/listinfo/warineur
  


I think you will find that Paris has to be garrisoned, and by the correct
units.

This is needed for looting as well as for rolling for Vichy...

Looking into the recesses of a somewhat fractured memory just at the moment.


-|steve

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.halisp.net/pipermail/warineur/attachments/20070822/55ec998c/attachment.html