[WarInEur] Allied Partisans

SGMINFO at aol.com SGMINFO at aol.com
Fri Aug 3 15:39:32 EDT 2007


 
In a message dated 03/08/2007 18:55:47 GMT Daylight Time, kentsue at cox.net  
writes:

Not sure what you alternative is.  Are you saying that  the players should 
not be given a choice and forced to play with post SPI game  distortions or are 
you saying that the three big changes cadre per turn, cut  rail, and ZOC to 
ZOC should  be options?


No I am saying this only with  partisan/garrison/recruitment.
 
ANY changes that we make should be options.  If they meet with general  
favour then they might become permanent in the next version again. We have a  wide 
pool of customers (potentially), anything that we do or propose, to avoid  
alienating a sector of the market ought to be optional. Those who do not like  
those items can leave them off the menu
 
Where we have differing interpretations of the basic rule, or longstanding  
tradition that it is played a certain way, that may may need to be accommodated 
 in such a way. but then there are other cases where a Damascene moment 
occurs,  and it is suddenly realised by those loooking at it, that the rule has 
been  completely misinterpreted for some time, without correction.
 
-|steve|-



   
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.halisp.net/pipermail/warineur/attachments/20070803/7795d90c/attachment.html


More information about the WarInEur mailing list