[WarInEur] Allied Partisans
SGMINFO at aol.com
SGMINFO at aol.com
Fri Aug 3 15:39:32 EDT 2007
In a message dated 03/08/2007 18:55:47 GMT Daylight Time, kentsue at cox.net
writes:
Not sure what you alternative is. Are you saying that the players should
not be given a choice and forced to play with post SPI game distortions or are
you saying that the three big changes cadre per turn, cut rail, and ZOC to
ZOC should be options?
No I am saying this only with partisan/garrison/recruitment.
ANY changes that we make should be options. If they meet with general
favour then they might become permanent in the next version again. We have a wide
pool of customers (potentially), anything that we do or propose, to avoid
alienating a sector of the market ought to be optional. Those who do not like
those items can leave them off the menu
Where we have differing interpretations of the basic rule, or longstanding
tradition that it is played a certain way, that may may need to be accommodated
in such a way. but then there are other cases where a Damascene moment
occurs, and it is suddenly realised by those loooking at it, that the rule has
been completely misinterpreted for some time, without correction.
-|steve|-
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.halisp.net/pipermail/warineur/attachments/20070803/7795d90c/attachment.html
More information about the WarInEur
mailing list