[Consim-l] Sand in the Whirlwind - KPG Opponent and GM Wanted

[Thomas Cundiff]

Well, to post it so prematurely would destroy the value of the magazine 
article sent to F&M on the subject.  I'm afraid you will just have to wait 
for F&M 145 or 146 (Jon wasn't specific and doesn't quite know which it will 
appear in).

What we are discussing is the appearance of a rule in Fire Combat, that 
doesn't appear in Melee combat, but players THINK it exists in Melee combat 
because it has in so many other games of the same type.  They're reading 
into the rules what simply doesn't exist.

But, you're correct about generalities, and as I referred to, specifics will 
have to wait for the article to appear.  Wouldn't be fair to F&M.

Cundiff

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Dave Kohr" <davekohr at gmail.com>
To: "consim" <consim-l at mailman.halisp.net>
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2007 7:49 PM
Subject: Re: [Consim-l] Sand in the Whirlwind - KPG Opponent and GM Wanted


> On 2/26/07, Thomas Cundiff <tdcgunslinger at worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>> Here's a perfect example of what I am talking about right in my own post.
>
> There isn't much point in continuing this thread with generalities.
>
> If you care about this so much, why don't you post the specific
> relevant parts of the Maiwand rules and explain how people are
> misreading them? It sounds as if there are 2 parts, one where the rule
> appears, and one where people think the rule applies but it actually
> doesn't appear in the rules.
>
> Dave
> _______________________________________________
> Consim-l mailing list
> Consim-l at mailman.halisp.net
> http://mailman.halisp.net/mailman/listinfo/consim-l
>