[Consim-l] New Forum: Old Soldiers Magazine
Mike NotSpecified
blockhead at bresnan.net
Sun Dec 23 00:32:26 EST 2007
Hi Tom,
I've always been a little leery of ACG in general, the Weider family just
strikes me as a little off. I enjoy the magazine, but have never bothered
with the forums.
Anyway, I good luck with your magazine, I think posts here to alert us to new
issues is fine. And I'm really enjoying the Flat Top counters you made me!
On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 18:07:35 -0500
"Thomas Cundiff" <tdcgunslinger at worldnet.att.net> wrote:
> Howdy Mike,
>
> Yes, I was referring to the ACG forums (Armchair General) i.e. that their
>forums have become populated by too many far left loons and right wing skin
>head types. Just too many people who have no common sense, and no effort
>made by their moderators to eliminate the riff-raff. It's not really a
>wargame website anyway. It's more of a political and semi-historical website
>and forum. They only incidentally cover wargaming. Given the current tone
>of American and indeed international politics, it's just a morass of anger
>and intolerance, I see no reason to associate with such individuals. In my
>mind doing so just lends aid and support. Rather like someone who
>contributes to the efforts of a charity that you know through its back door
>is lending aid and comfort to terrorists, if you don't remove yourself from
>the effort, you're just as guilty as anyone else who participated. Just no
>sense and too much outright hatred in all too much that is written over
>there.
>
> I also take your point referring to the fracturing of the wargaming
>community. And you are correct too about the amount of time it takes to post
>and read things all over the net. I think CSW has always the opportunity and
>ability to serve the needs of all wargamers if there was more effective
>modertion of the excess of its rather more .... shall we say vocal, imptuous,
>impulsive, and intemperate members. Sadly no effort is made to do that.
> And, there's no real reason to suffer the bad manners of bores.
>
> If Alan doesn't mind, I'll post things here from time to time such as the
>release of new issues. One was just released - I try to beat the Jan 1 issue
>by getting it out before Christmas every year - I've been lucky enough to do
>that for the last 4 years, nothing I dislike more than being late with an
>issue and I think it a fair thing for subscribers that they get the articles
>and things from the January issue before Christmas so they can use it during
>their Christmas time off from work and school - it's just a courteous thing
>to do for subscribers.
>
> I've not much cared for the format of the forums, or threads if that's what
>they're called, over at CSW either. The specific construction of the site
>could be better. For instance if every company had a forum and under their
>forum they could list sub forums for their specific games and company news
>and/or an opportunity for the publishers to chat with wargamers. That would
>be more useful than the single thread. Oh well, c'est la vie.
>
> Take Care & Merry Christmas,
> Tom
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike NotSpecified"
><blockhead at bresnan.net>
> To: <consim-l at mailman.halisp.net>
> Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2007 5:28 PM
> Subject: Re: [Consim-l] New Forum: Old Soldiers Magazine
>
>
>> I'm in favor of the group hug, no sarcasm. But Tom, can you clarify one
>> thing? Your original post refered to ACG, Armchair General forums. Is
>> that the group you are wanting to get away from?
>>
>> I've argued since the beginning of ConsimWorld that having multiple forum
>> sites (remember, most publishers have their own as well) tends to fracture
>> the hobby. I don't miss the flame wars on this list, but I do miss
>> hearing about new products etc. unless I'm carefull to sign up for
>> newsletters from all of the publishers I care about.
>>
>> Also, web forums are the least effective way to communicate in my mind,
>> how often do you think I'll rememeber to go check the Old Soldiers fourm,
>> the Columbia Games forum, the Avalanche Press forums at CW, the Avalanche
>> Press daily content at their website, the.... you get the idea. If I had
>> 2 hours a day to devote to the hobby I'd be playing, not surfing endless
>> websites and forums... I hope you'll post any Old Soldiers updates to this
>> list!
>>
>>
>> On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 08:32:28 -0800
>> "Dave Kohr" <davekohr at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> It was almost a flame war, but then it turned into a group hug. With
>>> strong undercurrents of sarcasm. :-)
>>>
>>> Dave
>>>
>>> On Dec 18, 2007 7:13 AM, Tim Allen <t.allen at uwinnipeg.ca> wrote:
>>>> umm...are we having a flame-war about flame-wars?
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Consim-l mailing list
>>> Consim-l at mailman.halisp.net
>>> http://mailman.halisp.net/mailman/listinfo/consim-l
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Consim-l mailing list
>> Consim-l at mailman.halisp.net
>> http://mailman.halisp.net/mailman/listinfo/consim-l
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Consim-l mailing list
> Consim-l at mailman.halisp.net
> http://mailman.halisp.net/mailman/listinfo/consim-l
More information about the Consim-l
mailing list